Apple
-
Apple has survived 50 years by being the only company integrating hardware and software; if the company loses because of AI it will be because the point of integration changes.
-
Apple is well and truly a services company; hardware is necessary but insufficient for future growth.
-
Apple introduced some impressive product updates; the real news, though, were the prices, which suggested that Apple is fully embracing being a services company.
-
For Apple, hitting middle age means a strategy primarily focused on monetizing its existing customers. It makes sense, but one wonders what happens next.
-
A core part of what makes Apple Apple is its organization structure; Tim Cook has said it will never change. However, if Apple is serious about being a services company, change it must.
-
Clayton Christensen continually predicts that Apple will be disrupted because his theory does not incorporate the importance of the user experience.
-
An Interview with Dan Kim About Intel, Nvidia, and the U.S. Government
An interview with Dan Kim about the CHIPS program, why the U.S. took a stake in Intel, and the fraught dispute about Nvidia and China.
-
iPhones 17 and the Sugar Water Trap
Apple’s iPhone announcement was impressive, but no one was impressed, because Apple is increasingly peripheral to what is changing the world.
-
SpaceX Buys Spectrum, Spectrum Specifics, SpaceX’s Big Bet
SpaceX just made a huge deal for spectrum, but they will still need partners; the real goal is knocking competition out of the game.
-
Google Remedy Decision, Reasonable Remedies, The Google Patronage Network
Google lost some battles but won the war in its search distribution case: the Google patronage network was deemed too important to undo.
-
Paradigm Shifts and the Winner’s Curse
When paradigms change, previous winners have the hardest time adjusting; that is why AI might be a challenge for Apple and Amazon
-
Netflix Earnings, Apple and F1
Netflix advertising will change the service; then, F1 might be headed to Apple TV, and it might work.