Services, not Devices

I have been very critical of Microsoft’s decision to organize functionally:

The larger question remains, though: why did Microsoft reorganize, and what should they have done instead?

“Nothing is more important at Microsoft than Windows.” — Steve Ballmer, CES 2012 Keynote

While last week I praised Microsoft’s diversification, from a profit-standpoint Microsoft is a three-product company: Windows, Office, and Server, and the latter two are direct beneficiaries of Windows dominance. More Windows machines mean more opportunities to sell Office. More Windows machines with Office mean more opportunities to sell Windows Server and its associated products like Exchange and SQL Server. Steve Ballmer is no dummy: he built Microsoft’s sales side, and knows exactly how critical a solid Windows base is to every other profit-generating product Microsoft sells.

Unfortunately, Windows is foundering. Division profits fell by 54% last quarter (8% if you exclude the $900 million Surface charge), and PC shipments are falling off a cliff. If you believe, as Ballmer likely does, that this imperils all of Microsoft, then there is a certain logic to putting all of the company’s resources to work to prop up Windows. From the One Microsoft memo:

We are rallying behind a single strategy as one company — not a collection of divisional strategies. Although we will deliver multiple devices and services to execute and monetize the strategy, the single core strategy will drive us to set shared goals for everything we do. We will see our product line holistically, not as a set of islands. We will allocate resources and build devices and services that provide compelling, integrated experiences across the many screens in our lives, with maximum return to shareholders…

We will reshape how we interact with our customers, developers and key innovation partners, delivering a more coherent message and family of product offerings. The evangelism and business development team will drive partners across our integrated strategy and its execution. Our marketing, advertising and all our customer interaction will be designed to reflect one company with integrated approaches to our consumer and business marketplaces.

The crux of the problem is in that second paragraph: no one is asking Microsoft to design its “customer interaction” to “reflect one company.” Customers are asking Microsoft to help them solve their problems and get their jobs done, not to make them Microsoft-only customers.

The solipsism is remarkable.

The truth is that Microsoft is wrapping itself around an axle of it’s own creation. The solution to the secular collapse of the PC market is not to seek to prop up Windows and force an integrated solution that no one is asking for; rather, the goal should be the exact opposite. Maximum effort should be focused on making Office, Server, and all the other products less subservient to Windows and more in line with consumer needs and the reality of computing in 2013.

Devices are vertical, services are horizontal

Devices are vertical, services are horizontal

The trouble for Microsoft in the devices layer is that they only know horizontal domination. When there was nothing but PC’s, the insistence on one experience no matter the hardware worked perfectly. However, a Dell and an HP are much more similar than a tablet and a web page, for example, each of which has its own input method, user expectations, and constraints. A multi-device world demands bespoke experiences, not one size fits all. Microsoft simply doesn’t seem to understand that, and the longer they seek to “horizontalize” devices the greater the write-offs will become.

However, look again at that picture: there remains a horizontal layer – services – and it’s there that Microsoft should focus its energy. For Office and Server specifically:

  • Documents remain essential and ubiquitous to all of the world outside of Silicon Valley; an independent Office division should be delivering bespoke experiences on every meaningful platform. Office 365 is a great start that would be even better with a version for iPad
  • A great many apps are simply front-ends for web-based services; an independent Server division should be delivering best-in-class interfaces and tools for app developers on every meaningful platform

As for Windows, let it focus on solidifying Microsoft’s hold on the enterprise (it’s here the need to fight the iPad is most acute), with a nice spillover into Home PCs and gaming, and accept the fact Windows was only ever relevant in the consumer market because nobody got fired for buying IBM.

“Devices and services” is only half right; unfortunately Ballmer picked the wrong half.

105 thoughts on “Services, not Devices

  1. Pingback: viagra


  3. Pingback: locksmith channelview 24 hour

  4. Pingback: Amazon's Whale Strategy | stratechery by Ben Thompson

  5. Pingback: b1 english test online

  6. Pingback: lands for sale

  7. Pingback: emergency emergency locksmith

  8. Pingback: mediums/medium

  9. Pingback: paragnost en paragnosten direct beschikbaar!

  10. Pingback: boost lol

  11. Pingback: Helderzienden online: Live helderziende - Heldervoelende helderziende

  12. Pingback: Websiteoptimalisatie/klikhier/websiteoptimalisatie

  13. Pingback:

  14. Pingback: paragnost

  15. Pingback: david gates

  16. Pingback: Suara Bakrie

  17. Pingback: Making Sense of Microsoft | stratechery by Ben Thompson

  18. Pingback: | The Today Online

  19. Pingback: Ian Filippini Santa Barbara

  20. Pingback: hefalimp cardijon

  21. Pingback: heating system repair contractor

  22. Pingback: air duct cleaning 77018

  23. Pingback: cialis au meilleur prix

  24. Pingback: cialis pilule bleue

  25. Pingback: chicken coop ideas

  26. Pingback: online slots

  27. Pingback: my company,

  28. Pingback: tadalafil en pharmacie

  29. Pingback:

  30. Pingback: magento connect

  31. Pingback: 100 free background check

  32. Pingback: apple products

  33. Pingback: liposuction chicago

  34. Pingback: acheter du cialis en espagne

  35. Pingback: I thought about this

  36. Pingback: cialis discount

  37. Pingback:

  38. Pingback: cialis in farmacia

  39. Pingback: automotive

  40. Pingback: Food and Drink

  41. Pingback: porn

  42. Pingback: useful

  43. Pingback: read full here

  44. Pingback: important

  45. Pingback:

  46. Pingback:

  47. Pingback:

  48. Pingback: video bugil

  49. Pingback: find out more

  50. Pingback:

  51. Pingback:

  52. Pingback: make vine likes

  53. Pingback: bitcoin casino

  54. Pingback: mmpr licensed producers mmpr licensed producers

  55. Pingback:

  56. Pingback:

  57. Pingback:

  58. Pingback: olie

  59. Pingback: buy youtube likes

  60. Pingback:

  61. Pingback: cheap viagra

  62. Pingback:

  63. Pingback: yamaha rxv475

  64. Pingback: Vaper

  65. Pingback: xlovecam credit adder

  66. Pingback: Travel

  67. Pingback: pilates

  68. Pingback:

  69. Pingback: Begum Law Firm

  70. Pingback: Top 100 Songs

  71. Pingback: Torquay Driving School

  72. Pingback: Slendera

  73. Pingback: thai massage

  74. Pingback: thai massage

  75. Pingback: Shaahin Cheyene

  76. Pingback: Shaahin Cheyene

  77. Pingback: ροζ τηλέφωνα

  78. Pingback: Penis enlargement

  79. Pingback: natures comfort reviews

  80. Pingback: Knoxville DUI Attorney

  81. Pingback: Kids & Teens

  82. Pingback: disclaimer

  83. Pingback: cupboards

  84. Pingback: Mulheres Infieis

  85. Pingback: Bad real-estate

  86. Pingback: document management software

  87. Pingback: terms of use

  88. Pingback: San Diego junk removal junk hauling san diego junk removal local junk removal hauling service san diego haul away san diego remove junk san diego junk removal service

  89. Pingback: Kids & Teens

  90. Pingback: Flight Tickets

  91. Pingback: Charles Floate

  92. Pingback: hills home market

  93. Pingback:

  94. Pingback: Richard McArthur Washington

  95. Pingback:

  96. Pingback:

  97. Pingback:

  98. Pingback: DIRTY ARMY

  99. Pingback: model

  100. Pingback: Arganollie

  101. Pingback: tips to avoid premature ejaculation

  102. Pingback: Richard McArthur Reid Real Estate

  103. Pingback: Richard McArthur Realtor

  104. Pingback: Photive SOUNDSCAPE 8 Review

  105. Pingback: Richard McArthur Washington

Comments are closed.